I write that Victor Babariko in Belarus is the candidate, pleasant Moscow. The type worked in the Russian structures and all that. That’s nothing people do not learn even the obvious examples.
Look at Poroshenko: Russian-speaking, former leader of SDPU(u) and the Party of regions, the Minister of the government of Azarov, a parishioner of the Moscow Patriarchate, the visitor of the Kiev club of Dmitry Kiselyov, if you know what I mean. And than all ended? Really fought a war against Russia, and even Tomos organized. Yeah, left all of us failed Minsk agreement, resuscitated corruption and rose from obscurity Medvedchuk, but not because of the type the Kremlin worked.
Another example: Kuchma. He is generally the ideal way of life of the Soviet man. A poor guy from the village was able to get an education, got a job on the production and rose to the top in complete loyalty to the Soviet regime. Went to the polls in the independent Ukraine, promising moscholiou part of the electorate everything they wanted. And how did it end? Twisted horns Pro-Russian separatists in the Crimea (Meshkov, remember?), really developed system of the state and even left the ideological construction of the “Ukraine – not Russia”. Yes, after Kuchma we have a national split, the oligarchs and the political-criminal-like enclave of the Donbas, but it’s also not because Kuchma type on the Kremlin worked.
So! It is not necessary to approach the assessment of political figures are stereotypical. Belarus, like Ukraine, produces its own political meaning. And that in itself is anti-Kremlin thing. Babariko and anyone else in Belarus will develop an independent Belarus is already unbreakable. Putin can try is that to win this country in one form or another, but she not come to him.
Source: Dmitry Litvin / Facebook
Posted with personal permission of the author